MicroFIT financials: inflation, taxes, and break-even

In this article I looked at the worst case scenario of how panel output degradation and inflation cut into expected microFIT income. Thanks Maury for posting a comment to correct me that actual degradation, at least in one case, is significantly less than warranty levels suggest. Unfortunately inflation still remains a (bigger) problem.

In addition, there is a small issue of income taxes.

As we discussed in other articles, solar panel depreciation will be gradually written off against microFIT income, up until break-even point (when there is nothing left to depreciate). At that point, income tax kicks in. This horse is beaten enough.

For most microFIT owners, income tax will be charged at the marginal tax rate depending on your total personal income for the year. Let’s say for the sake of argument that folks with lower levels of income will not be spending money on microFIT, so let’s say we are somewhere in the middle. According to this CRA table, provincial and federal taxes might be around 33-36%.

Unfortunately, microFIT is no longer being offered to small business, so… this tax rate is what it is. Grandfathered microFIT systems that were registered under corporate entities will be subject to corporate income tax rates, which in case of small business is something like 18% – half of our personal tax rate in this example.

How income is affected by income taxes

MicroFIT income with degradation, inflation, and income tax

MicroFIT income with degradation, inflation, and income tax

So, the plot thickens…

  • We started with expected monthly return of $3,500, total income $70,000
  • With worst-case scenario degradation reduced income by $6,755 (10%) to $63,245
  • With 2.5% annual inflation,  we lose $13,636 in purchasing power (20%), down to $49,609 in present-value dollars
  • Finally, once the break-even is reached, we start paying 36% income tax and lose an additional $7,494 (another ~10% or so). Total microFIT income, after tax and in present value dollars is now $42,115

And that’s how $70,000 becomes $42,115 – and technically nothing was actually stolen.

How break-even is affected

Now, the break-even. To keep this example simple, we start paying income tax when cumulative microFIT income exceeds our theoretical $27,000 installation cost:

microFIT income affected by degradation, inflation, taxes

microFIT income affected by degradation, inflation, taxes

In this table above we’ve got BE 0 = break-even in the reference calculation of $3,500 per year – this is the numbers you see in sales brochures, quotes, and proposals.

BE 1 = break-even with worst-case panel output degradation. Break-even slips away by about a year.

BE 2 = break-even with degradation and inflation. Break-even slips away by another year.

So the forces of nature move break-even away by two years. This brings us to the first tax bill in year 11.

Conclusions

  1. When you get microFIT quotes and such, read not only what they are, but also how they get there
  2. If you don’t get enough detail, ask. If you don’t get answers, go someplace else
  3. There is a difference between $70,000 and $42,115
  4. If you get a brochure that advertises microFIT returns of 14% or even 17% per year, RUN
Dec 3, 2010Solar Energy - - -
CommentsRSS6
  1. Very good points.

    You mention being cautious about the quotes you get, when it comes to the ROIs advertised. I get asked about that a lot when people contact me about my site about the system on our roof (www.yourturn.ca/solar). I always find it interesting that people care a lot about what the installer says the return on investment will be. The installer has no control over the return on investment, but quotes on ROI from installers are always a huge topic and point of confusion.

    Two installers can tell you whatever they like, but the fact is that if they’re installing equivalent hardware in the same location facing the same direction, then it will produce about the same amount of electricity. And you will make the same amount of money.

    So when it comes to installers, what matters is the quality of their materials and workmanship, and whether they’ll stand behind their work and be there in five, ten, twenty years when you need to call them to fix something.

    Of course, they include projections of income in their quotes because people want to see that. But that always seems strange to me, because the installers don’t have control over the sun, and a 175 watt panel is only going to produce 175 watts under ideal conditions, nothing more, nothing less. So these quotes are really immaterial (ie: you’re not going to get more money by going with an installer who says your system will generate more money than the same system from someone else).

    But of course, the big thing you can learn when looking at these ROI quotes, is how frank the installer is being with you. ROI on these systems is a very complicated issue, and I think it would actually be bad business for someone to go into all the details, I know I wouldn’t, it’s more information than most customers want to know. But someone who glibly quotes the nameplate capacity, times an optimistic capacity factor, times 20 years…you have to wonder about that.

    –Julian
    Solar Powered in Toronto – http://www.yourturn.ca/solar

  2. I don’t know if you are still monitoring this page, but first of all, thanks for pulling the info together. I have been looking into the ROI of a solar installation in consideration for getting one myself.

    I see one potential problem with your calculations: I see that your system is a 3.75kW installation. I think your projected revenue of $3500 per year is optimistic. Based on data I’ve collected I would say a more realistic annual revenue would be closer to $3000, or even less.

    Is $3500 an actual number or an estimate?

  3. Hi John
    The “starting” numbers in this article were not pulled from a specific RETscreen analysis, but more or less out of thin air. They could be considered representative of what might actually happen, but my main point was to illustrate the huge impact of all these other forces of nature that are not being advertised all too often, rather than drill into analysis of a specific system.

    Speaking for my own system, I think 3.75 kW as-built on my house will pull in more than $3500/year. You can follow my progress through the year if you go to the main page, http://www.greentoronto.me, most recent 3 or 4 articles deal with my actual performance numbers, how they compare to RETscreen modeling, and how RETscreen modeling compares to actual weather we had in Toronto so far this year.

    Cheers
    Dennis

  4. Hi

    I just found this blog. Wonderful amount of information. Your cost analysis is eye-opening. Would you be open to providing your excel tool to help others analyze there specific scenario? My system will probably settle in around 2.5Kw.

    thanx

    scott

  5. Hi Scott,
    glad to hear this info helps.
    I’ll let you in on a little secret… we’ve submitted an iPhone/iPad/iPod app to Apple. This app takes your system size input and gives you estimated financial breakdown for the next 20 years. Do you have one of these devices? If you do, please keep visiting our main page http://www.greentoronto.me for updates. We should have an announcement on this in a week or so.
    If you don’t have an Apple device… let me know if you have specific questions and I’ll help. I used a number of excels over time and not all of them are as polished as they appear in screenshots.
    Cheers
    Dennis

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>